Skip to main content
Home

Search site

Main navigation

    • What is the Boundary Waters?
    • Mining Threat
    • Our Work
    • Resource Library
    The Issue
    • Take action to protect the Boundary Waters
      Action Center
    • Action Center
    • Speak Out
    • Volunteer
    • Shop
    • Ways to Give
    • Kids for the Boundary Waters
    Take Action
    • Our Team
    • Mission & Impact
    • Contact Us
    • Partners
    • Business Coalition
    • Ely Headquarters
    About Us
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Media Room
    News & Events
    • Monthly Giving
    • Legacy and Estate Giving
    • Donor Advised Fund
    • Boundary Waters Action Fund
    • More Ways to Give
    • Annual reports
    Ways to give
  • Donate
Economics

Key-Log Economics Report

Spencer Phillips et al.
Share
Economics

Copper Mining in the BWCA Watershed: Minnesota’s Arrowhead Region Has Far More to Lose Than Gain

A new study of the Arrowhead Region’s economy reveals a diverse and growing economy in which numerous industries – including healthcare, tourism and recreation, small businesses, manufacturing, construction, services, forest products and taconite mining – can coexist peacefully as long as copper mining does not occur in the Boundary Waters watershed.

The report also details the formidable economic costs to the three-county Arrowhead Region that would follow the introduction of sulfide-ore copper mining within the Boundary Waters Watershed – including major losses in jobs, visitor spending, property value, Main Street businesses and more. Although taconite mining outside the watershed still accounts for 2.5 percent of the region’s overall employment, the majority of economic activity supporting jobs in a wide range of industries now relies predominantly on a healthy, pristine Boundary Waters Wilderness to attract and retain business owners, workers, visitors and retirees.

The new study concludes that opening the watershed to sulfide-ore copper mining would result in huge costs for businesses, workers and communities throughout the region by damaging the strongest growing elements of the existing Arrowhead economy.

Since the mining decline of the 1980s, the Arrowhead has seen growth in key indicators:

  • Population: Steady growth in population (after an early-1980s decline).
  • Income: Steady growth in personal income across a diverse set of industries.
  • Small Business: Growth in sole proprietors’ employment and income.
  • Investment: Increases in non-labor income, such as investments and Social Security.
  • Diversifying Economy: These industries have experienced the strongest growth:
    • Professional services - up 12.3% (since 2010);
    • Real estate - up 12.1% (since 2010);
    • Educational services - up 10.0% (since 2010);
    • Arts, entertainment and recreation - up 8.9% (since 2010).

Based on conservative assumptions, sulfide-ore copper mining in the Boundary Waters watershed would cost the Arrowhead economy:

  • Travel & Tourism: $288 million in lost annual visitor spending that would support:
    • 4,490 local jobs;
    • $76 million in residents’ income;
    • $31 million in state and local taxes, and
    • $181 million in proprietor's income and business-to-business transactions.
  • Diverse & Growing Industries: 5,066 to 22,791 lost jobs and between $402 million and $1.6 billion in lost annual income if sulfide-ore copper mining suppresses or reverses overall amenity-based growth at the heart of the Arrowhead’s recovery since the early 1980s.  
  • Property Value: $509 million in lost property value – a one-time drop in asset value should sulfide-ore mining be allowed in the Boundary Waters watershed that will spawn annual reductions in local property tax revenue throughout the region.
  • “By implementing the mining withdrawal, as proposed, these and other costs would be avoided, thus delivering a benefit to the American people and Minnesotans equivalent to a one-time payment of more than $6.1 billion. In addition, the mining withdrawal could save between 9,556 and 27,281 jobs.”

The new report by Key-Log Economics, which totals 42 pages and examines and analyzes a wide range of economic data in St. Louis, Cook and Lake counties, can be found here.

 

07/12/2017

Footer

  • About the Save the Boundary Waters
  • Land Acknowledgement
  • Media
  • Boundary Waters for All
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Contact Us
  • Action Center
  • Ely Headquarters
  • Manage your preferences
  • Ways to give

1% for the planet logo

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Visit the Boundary Waters

Newsletter Signup

P.O. Box 625
Ely, MN 55731
218.365.7808
Info@SavetheBoundaryWaters.org

Copyright 2025 Save the Boundary Waters

  • The Issue
    • What is the Boundary Waters?
    • Mining Threat
    • Our Work
    • Resource Library
  • Take Action
    • Action Center
    • Speak Out
    • Volunteer
    • Shop
    • Ways to Give
    • Kids for the Boundary Waters
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Mission & Impact
    • Contact Us
    • Partners
    • Business Coalition
    • Ely Headquarters
  • News & Events
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Media Room
  • Ways to give
    • Monthly Giving
    • Legacy and Estate Giving
    • Donor Advised Fund
    • Boundary Waters Action Fund
    • More Ways to Give
    • Annual reports
  • Donate